After watching the instructional videos, the workflow for ProtoShare is somewhat confusing. Here's what I've gathered so far:
1. You create an interactive wireframe with low visual fidelity so as to not distract the client with too much eye candy.
2. Client team comments on the wireframe which demonstrates site flow and basic layout.
3. Once the wireframe has gone through a few review and refine rounds, static 'high visual fidelity' comps are created.
is this the suggested workflow? Does protoshare work best if interactive wireframes are kept simple, meaning that you should not attempt to polish the prototype beyond the typical gray box and default buttons or are people attempting to create high visual fidelity along with interactivity inside their protoshare wireframes?
I have more questions, but will attempt to put them in the correct thread.